Formulation and Evaluation of Floating tablet of Metronidazole for eradication of Helicobacter
pylori
Rungta College of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Kurud Road Kohka, Bhilai, CG, India, 490024
*Corresponding Author E-mail: ajazuddin@rungta.ac.in
ABSTRACT:
Metronidazole
is widely used antimicrobial drug against Gram-negative and Gram-positive
anaerobic bacteria. Floating drug
delivery systems (FDDS) offer a number of applications for drugs having poor
bioavailability because of narrow absorption window in the upper part of
gastrointestinal tract. It was used for preparing floating dosage forms that
are designed to retain in the stomach for a long time and have developed as a
drug delivery system for better eradication of Helicobacter Pylori in peptic ulcer diseases. In the present study hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose
(HPMC) and micro crystalline cellulose (MCC) are used in different
concentrations and sodium bicarbonate was used as effervescent agent. Five formulations (F1-F5) were prepared and
evaluated for various physicochemical parameters like hardness, friability,
floating ability and drug release profiles and were found to be within range.
In general, these systems can float in the gastric conditions and control the
drug release from the tablets. Formulation
was optimized on the basis of different tablet properties and drug release
pattern in invitro release profile. In this study it was confirmed that the
formulations containing polymer like HPMC K15M and MCC showed better floating
properties.
KEYWORDS: Metronidazole, floating,
polymer, HPMC, MCC.
INTRODUCTION:
Floating drug delivery systems (FDDS) offer a
number of applications for drugs having poor bioavailability because of narrow
absorption window in the upper part of gastrointestinal tract (1,2). The gastric retention of the dosage form in
the stomach depends upon various factors like pH, size of the dosage form, food
intake, and biological factors which include age, body mass index, gender,
posture, and diseased states. Out of all available gastro retentive systems
floating tablets, floating beads, floating granules and floating microspheres
have gained major importance in the formulation development more recently
(3,4).
Floating delivery systems seem to offer a greater
safety for clinical uses than other approaches. Various dosage forms like
tablets, capsules, beads, microparticles, pellets,
granules have been evaluated for floating systems (5,6). Over the past decade
the use of biodegradable polymers for development of sustained drug delivery
systems has increased dramatically. Synthetic polymers offer greater advantages
than natural ones, wherein they can be tailored to develop a wide range of
properties. However, there is a trend to restrict the use of synthetic polymers
in pharmaceutical formulations since processing techniques of these polymers
are based on organic solvents (7,8). Various approaches ranging from coated
tablets and gels to biodegradable microparticles and
osmotic system have been used to sustain the drug release from dosage
forms(9,10). Metronidazole, chemically
2-(2-methyl-5-nitro-1Himidazol-1-yl) ethanol, is a nitroimidazole
antibiotic medication used particularly for anaerobic bacteria and protozoa. Metronidazole is an antibiotic, amebicide,
and antiprotozoal. It is the drug of choice for first
episodes of mild-to-moderate Clostridium difficile
infection. Metronidazole is indicated for the
treatment of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, as part of a multidrug
regimen in peptic ulcer disease (11,12). In the present study, Metronidazole floating tablets were prepared to increase
the gastric residence time and absorption of drug through gastric mucosa and to
decrease the dose frequency. The prepared tablets were evaluated for their
floating properties and in-vitro drug release.
MATERIAL AND METHOD:
The chemicals used in this study were pure drug Metronidazole and polymers like HPMC K15M (Jubilant life
science limited), carbopol 934 (Loba
chemie), other
excipients like Micro crystalline cellulose, magnesium stearate,
talc, sodium bicarbonate (Loba chemie).
Preparation of calibration curve of Metronidazole in 0.1 N HCl
Preparation of 0.1N HCl
solution
To produce 0.1N HCl take 9.8 ml of concentrated HCl and diluted with distilled water and make up the volume
up to 1000 ml.
Preparation of standard stock solution
The stock solution (100µg/ml) of metronidazole was prepared by dissolving accurately about
10mg of drug in small amount of methanol and the volume was making up to 100ml
with 0.1N HCl to prepare standard stock solution.
Determination of λmax
Calibration curve of metronidazole
was prepared with 0.1N HCl and the λmax was found to be 274.6 nm.
Preparation of calibration curve
From the stock solution of metronidazole,
a series of dilutions ranging from 2-10 µg/ml were prepared. Absorbance of
these solutions was measured at 274.6 nm wavelength and calibration curve was
plotted between concentration and absorbance UV-Visible (Spectrophotometer-
Shimadzu UV-1800). The maximum absorbance of metronidazole
was observed at 274-277nm respectively.
Preparation of Floating matrix tablets by direct
compression method
Accurately weighed quantities of polymer like HPMC
and MCC were taken in a mortar and mixed thoroughly, to this mixture required
quantity of metronidazole was added and mixed
slightly with pestle, after that
accurately weighed quantity of sodium bicarbonate was taken separately
in a mortar and powdered with pestle.
The powder is passed through sieve #40 and mixed with the drug blend
which is also passed through sieve #40.
The whole mixture was collected in a plastic bag and mixed for 3
minutes. To this mixture magnesium stearate was added
and mixed for 5 minutes, later Talc was added and mixed for 2 minutes. The
mixture was compressed into tablets (Tablet Compression machine Shakti).
Characterization of tablets for physicochemical
parameters
The prepared Metronidazole
floating tablets were evaluated for their physicochemical parameters like hardness,
friability and drug content.
Tablet weight variation
Every individual tablet in a batch should be in
uniform weight and weight variation within permissible limits. Twenty tablets
were randomly selected and accurately weighted using an electronic balance. The
results are expressed as mean values of 20 determinations.
Hardness
The hardness of tablets is defined as “the force
required in breaking a tablet” and it is determined using Monsanto hardness
testing apparatus.
The tablet is placed vertically in the tester and
the force required to break the tablet is measured.
Friability
The friability of tablets was measured in a Roche friabilator. 20 tablets of known weight (Wo) were taken in a drum for a fixed time (100 revolutions)
and weight (W) again. Percentage friability was calculated from the loss in
weight as given in equation below. The weight loss should not be more than 1%
w/w.15
% friability = (Wo-W)/Wo X 100
Table 1: Formulation
table
|
Ingredients |
Quantity in mg (F1) |
Quantity in mg (F2) |
Quantity in mg (F3) |
Quantity in mg (F4) |
Quantity in mg (F5) |
|
Metronidazole |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
HPMC K15 M |
10 |
15 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
|
MCC |
33.77 |
28.29 |
33.77 |
37.7 |
28.29 |
|
NaHCO3 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
5.4 |
|
Mg stearate |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
Talc |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
Carbopol 934 |
-- |
-- |
10 |
6 |
15 |
|
Total wt. |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
In vitro floating lag time13
The in vitro buoyancy was determined by floating
lag time. The tablets were placed in a 100 ml beaker containing 0.1N HCl. The media was kept in stagnant condition and the
temperature was maintained at 370C. The time required for the tablet
to rise to the surface and float was determined as floating lag time.
In vitro floating duration time
The floating capacity of the tablets was determined
using USP Dissolution apparatus II containing 900ml of simulated gastric fluid.
The time interval between introduction of the tablet in to the dissolution
medium and its buoyancy to the dissolution medium was taken as buoyancy lag
time and for which time the tablet constantly floats on the surface of the medium
was observed visually and taken as floating duration.
In vitro drug release14
The release of Metronidazole
from floating tablets was determined by using Dissolution apparatus (ELECTROLAB
TDT- 08L. The dissolution test was performed using 900 ml 0.1N HCl solution at 37 ± 0.5oC temperature and at 50 rpm. At
specified time intervals, samples of 1 ml were withdrawn from the dissolution
medium and that amount was replaced with fresh medium to maintain the volume
constant. The samples were filtered and diluted to a suitable concentration
with 0.1 N HCl.
The absorbance of the diluted samples was measured at 274nm for Metronidazole by using UV Visible spectrophotometer. The
percentage drug release was calculated using an equation obtained from standard
curve.
Characterization of drug in Floating tablets:
FTIR studies were conducted for characterization of
drug in tablets of selected optimized formulation. The floating tablets were
compressed and powdered. The pelletized powder along with KBr
was used for FTIR studies. The IR spectra were recorded using Fourier Transform
Infrared spectrophotometer. The IR spectra of pure Metronidazole
and pelletized powder of tablets were taken, interpreted and compared with each
other.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Figure 1: Standard
calibration curve of metronidazole in 0.1 N HCl
Calibration curve of Metronidazole
was prepared in 0.1N HCl. The slope of the graph was
found to be 0.042 and intercept with -0.004 with regression coefficient R2 = 0.999.
FTIR spectrum of Metronidazole
The FTIR spectroscopy was performed for
identification of pure drug and drug excipient
compatibility study. The spectra obtained in figure no. 2 from the FTIR
spectrophotometer in the range of 4000-500 cm-1 is of pure drug and that in
figure no. 3 is drug with excipients which showed
similar/almost similar peaks as that of pure drug i.e. for C-H, C=C, C=N
stretching. This indicates no modification and interaction between drug and excipients.
Figure 2: FTIR spectra of metronidazole, mtronidazole +excipients and excipients
Table 4:
Evaluation of different formulations of extended release Metronidazole tablet:
|
Formulation |
Hardness (kg/cm3 ) |
Friability (%) |
Drug content (%) |
|
F1 |
5 |
0.197 |
92 |
|
F2 |
5 |
0.265 |
90 |
|
F3 |
5.8 |
0.294 |
85 |
|
F4 |
6 |
0.186 |
82 |
|
F5 |
5.8 |
0.301 |
87 |
Table 5: Comparative in-vitro
dissolution study of different formulations of Metronidazole
floating tablet:
|
Time in hrs. |
(F1) |
(F2) |
(F3) |
(F4) |
F(5) |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0.16 |
40.21 |
21.06 |
9.57 |
5.74 |
6.57 |
|
0.33 |
40.41 |
28.72 |
15.31 |
11.48 |
14.31 |
|
0.5 |
47.87 |
36.38 |
17.23 |
15.31 |
16.23 |
|
0.66 |
51.7 |
42.12 |
21.06 |
22.97 |
20.06 |
|
0.83 |
59.36 |
47.87 |
30.63 |
28.72 |
32.63 |
|
1 |
67.06 |
51.7 |
32.55 |
34.46 |
33.55 |
|
1.16 |
70.85 |
61.27 |
37.43 |
40.46 |
35.43 |
|
1.33 |
74.6 |
67.02 |
40.45 |
49.43 |
41.45 |
|
1.5 |
80.42 |
70.85 |
46.86 |
55.53 |
44.86 |
|
2 |
84.25 |
78.5 |
52.65 |
59.77 |
54.65 |
|
2.5 |
88.05 |
82.34 |
65.48 |
63.35 |
66.48 |
|
3 |
93.82 |
86.17 |
76.59 |
67.13 |
74.59 |
|
3.5 |
97.65 |
93.82 |
84.25 |
72.65 |
82.25 |
|
4 |
97.66 |
97.65 |
86.55 |
78.43 |
83.55 |
|
4.5 |
-- |
-- |
86.76 |
78.45 |
81.76 |
Figure 3: Comparative in-vitro dissolution study of different test formulations of Metronidazole floating
tablets .
Table 6: Floating lag time and floating duration
|
Formulation |
Floating lag time (sec) |
Floating duration time |
|
F1 |
12 sec. |
7hrs |
|
F2 |
8 sec. |
7hrs |
|
F3 |
60 sec |
15min |
|
F4 |
300 sec |
5min |
|
F5 |
-- |
0min. |
RESULT AND DISCUSSION:
Floating tablets of metronidazole
were developed to increase the gastric residence time of the drug, so that they
can be retained in stomach for longer time and help in controlled release of
drug and absorption of drug through gastric mucosa and to decrease the dose frequency.
The punched tablets of different formulation were also subjected to several
evaluation parameters like tablet hardness, friability, dissolution study, etc.
which is shown in table no. 4. The hardness of tablets ranged between 4-7 which
indicated good mechanical strength and ability to withstand physical pressure
and stress. The friability was between 0.186 to 0.301 which is within limits
and shows good resistance of tablets to mechanical stress. The percent drug
content of tablets was within permissible limits i.e. 82% to 92%. The prepared floating tablets were also
evaluated for their floating properties
and in-vitro drug release. The drug release profile of all the formulation was
given in table 5 and figure 3. Based on the results from in-vitro floating
studies the formulations F1 and F2 containing polymer like HPMC K15M and MCC
was selected as best formulation with optimum floating properties.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
The authors want to acknowledge the management and
library of Rungta College of Pharmaceutical Sciences
and Research, Kohka-Kurud road Bhilai,
for providing necessary infrastructure and literature for the compilation of
the work.
REFERENCE:
1. Rao G K, Praveen Kumar M, Rajendra
prasad M, Reddy P.V. Development and in vivo
evaluation of gastroretentive delivery systems for cefuroxime axetil. Saudi
Pharmaceutical Journal, 2012:131.
2. Ajazuddin, Saraf S. Legal regulations of
complementary and alternative medicines in different countries. Pharmacognosy
Review.6 (12); 2012: 154-160.
3. Patil P, Someshwara Rao B, Kulkarn S.V, Basavaraj, Surpur C, Ammanage A. Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of Floating
Matrix Tablets of Ofloxacin. Asian J. Res. Pharm.
Sci. 1(1); 2011: 17-22.
4. Amarji B, Raghuwanshi D, Vyas SP, Kanaujia P. Lipid nano spheres (LNSs) for enhanced oral bioavailability of amphotericin B: development and characterization. Journal
of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 3(3); 2007: 264-269.
5. Giri TK, Verma S, Alexander A, Ajazuddin, Badwaik H, Tripathy M, Tripathi D.K. Crosslinked biodegradable alginate hydrogel
floating beads for stomach site specific controlled delivery of metronidazole. FARMACIA. 61(3); 2013: 533-550.
6. Alexander A, Singh A. Herbal drugs used for the treatment
of asthma: An overview. Int J Cur Biomed Phar Res.
1(2); 2011: 67-79 .
7. Giri TK, Choudhary C, Alexander A, Ajazuddin, Badwaik H, Tripathy M, Tripathi D.K.
Sustained Release of Diltiazem Hydrochloride from
Cross-linked Biodegradable IPN Hydrogel Beads of
Pectin and Modified Xanthan Gum. Indian Journal of
Pharmaceutical Sciences. 75(6); 2013: 619-742.
8. Ajazuddin, Giri, TK, Saraf,
S, Saraf, S, Tripathi, DK.
Approaches for breaking the barriers of drug permeation through transdermal drug delivery. Journal of Controlled Release.
164; 2012: 26-40.
9. Giri TK, Kumar K, Alexander A, Ajazuddin,
Badwaik H, Tripathy M, Tripathi D.K. Novel Controlled Release Solid Dispersion for
the Delivery of Diclofenac Sodium. Current Drug Delivery. 10; 2013: 435-443.
10. Dewangan D, Kumar T, Alexander A, Nagori
K, Tripathi
DK. Pyrazole: Their Chemistry and Pharmacological
Potentials: A Review. Review Article Current Pharma
Research ISSN. 1(4); 2011: 369-377.
11. Babu G.D, Chandra S.R, A. Sree
Devi. Formulation and evaluation of novel metronidazole
floating tablets. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences;
2(4); 2011: 1657-1662.
12. Angare D, Giri T, Tripathi
DK, Ajazuddin. Unexplored areas and new findings in
lipid emulsion serving as a potential drug carrier for lipophilic
drugs: a review. Trends Med Res. 2012.
13. J Josephine LJ, Mehul RT,
Wilson B, Shanaz B, Bincy
R. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of floating microspheres of anti-retro
viral drug as a gastro retentive dosage form. International Journal of Research
In Pharmacy And Chemistry 1(3); 2011: 519-527.
14. Nasa P, Mahant S, Floating drug
delivery system using Methocel K100M and
E50:Formulation and characterization. Acta Pharmaceutica Sciencia, 53; 2011:
57-65.
15. Modi V. C. and Dr. Seth A.K. Formulation and Evaluation of Diltiazem Sustained Release Tablets. International Journal
of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 1(3); 2010.
Received on 04.05.2016
Modified on 03.06.2016
Accepted on 18.06.2016 ©
RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016;
9(7):870-874.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00165.7